Rev. John Ntim Fordjour, Member of Parliament for Assin South, has rebuffed allegations of a sexual relationship with Ghanaian musician Angel Maxine, describing the claims as false and unfounded.
The disclaimer was issued during proceedings of Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs, where lawmakers are currently considering the controversial Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill.
Rev. Ntim Fordjour, a sponsor and vocal supporter of the Bill, stated that he has never had any form of sexual or romantic relationship with Angel Maxine.
Also read: The Front pages: Friday, 24th April, 2026 (Newspapers)
“Contrary to his or her claim that he or she has had some sexual intercourse with me, I have never engaged in any sexual intercourse apart from what God created between Adam and Eve,” he said during the committee sitting.
The issue was brought up by Samuel Nartey George, Member of Parliament for Ningo-Prampram, who referenced public claims made by Angel Maxine. The musician, who identifies as transgender, has reportedly alleged a relationship with the Assin South legislator.
Mr. Sam George questioned whether such public declarations could fall under provisions of the Bill, particularly clauses dealing with ‘holding out’ as LGBTQ+.
He argued that individuals who openly identify as LGBTQ+ or make such claims publicly could be subject to legal scrutiny under the proposed legislation.
“I want to state categorically that I have never been LGBTQ. I have never had a relationship with whoever this Angel Maxine is, in his or her old or present life,” he stated.
He stressed that the claims do not reflect reality and should not be used as a basis for any legal or public examples.
The exchange formed part of a broader debate on provisions within the Bill, especially Clause 7, which defines what constitutes a “grossly indecent act.”
According to discussions in the committee, the clause includes public displays of same-sex romantic relationships or actions by individuals who have undergone gender reassignment or cross-dressing with intent linked to LGBTQ+ identification.
Rev. Ntim Fordjour argued that individuals who openly declare or promote such identities could provide prima facie grounds for enforcement under the law.
“If we fail to uphold the ‘holding out,’ then what is the foundation of the mischief we are trying to cure?” he questioned.
Ongoing National Debate
The Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill continues to generate intense national and international debate, with strong opinions from both supporters and critics.
While proponents argue that the legislation protects Ghanaian cultural and family values, critics have raised concerns about human rights implications and potential discrimination.
The latest development adds another layer of controversy to the ongoing parliamentary deliberations, as lawmakers navigate both legal interpretations and public sensitivities surrounding the Bill.