A new chapter is unfolding in Ghana’s national security framework as state security agencies and media leaders join forces to confront the rising threat of misinformation, fake news, and digital propaganda.
At a high-level engagement in Accra, senior officials from Ghana’s security architecture and key media institutions declared a “new era” of cooperation, warning that rapidly spreading false information online now poses a threat comparable to traditional security risks.
Deputy National Security Coordinator, Elizabeth Yankah, cautioned that Ghana’s long-standing peace cannot be taken for granted in today’s digital environment.
Also read: Relief for Volta coast as Mahama pushes $150M WACA Project to execution stage
“Malinformation today can do more damage than bullets,” she stated, stressing that false narratives erode trust, fuel divisions, and complicate the work of security agencies.
She pointed to recent tensions in areas such as Bawku, where unverified information has exacerbated ethnic divisions and heightened insecurity.
Yankah further warned that the wider West African sub-region remains volatile, facing threats including terrorism, kidnapping, armed banditry, and extremist activities.
“Ghana may be a beacon of peace, but that peace is not automatic. It must be protected every single day,” she said.
In a significant policy direction, Yankah described the media as a frontline partner in safeguarding national stability.
“The media is not just a bystander — you are a critical partner,” she noted. “When you verify before publishing, you protect lives. When you avoid sensationalism, you preserve peace.”
She acknowledged that security agencies alone can no longer guarantee stability in a fast-moving digital landscape where misinformation often spreads faster than official responses.
To address this, she outlined key measures including real-time verification channels between journalists and security agencies, unified crisis communication protocols, and quarterly review platforms to strengthen trust.
“No more silence. No more conflicting statements. We will speak swiftly, clearly, and together,” she assured.
Yankah also dismissed fears of media suppression, emphasising that the initiative is not about censorship but responsibility.
“Freedom of expression is a constitutional right — and we will defend it,” she added.
Echoing her position, Director of the National Counter Terrorism Fusion Centre, Timothy Ba-Taa-Banah, underscored the importance of the partnership.
“Security services are the backbone of stability, but the media is the voice of the people,” he said, describing the alliance as essential to building trust and national cohesion.
He emphasised that national security is a shared responsibility involving citizens, institutions, and the media.
Brigadier-General Ba-Taa-Banah called on the media to amplify public awareness efforts, encouraging citizens to report suspicious activities promptly.
“If you see something, say something,” he urged, highlighting the need for stronger collaboration between the public and security agencies.
President of the Private Newspapers and Online News Publishers Association of Ghana, David Tamakloe, welcomed the renewed engagement, acknowledging past tensions while expressing optimism about improved cooperation.
“We need clarity on where press freedom ends, and security concerns begin,” he said, advocating for structured engagement between the media and national security institutions.
He stressed the importance of responsible journalism, noting that reporting must not compromise national security.
Held under the theme “Truth and Trust: Partnering for National Security in Peace and Crisis Times,” the meeting highlighted the critical role of accurate information in maintaining national stability.
Participants agreed that in the digital age, Ghana’s security will depend not only on intelligence and enforcement, but also on responsible journalism, credible information, and institutional trust.
As misinformation continues to evolve as a modern threat, Ghana is positioning itself as a model for balancing democratic freedoms with national security imperatives.